I just started looking into grad schools--I'm a junior in undergrad right now. Naturally, as everybody does, I took a look at UCLA and I'm wondering if anyone who's gotten in could answer a few questions for me.

1.) I read over the requirements and found -nothing- about a portfolio--am I missing something? Is a portfolio only optional?

2.) Does the school that you're currently enrolled in affect their decision? For example, if you graduate from a school with very little money in the film budget so it kind of sucks a whole lot, are you pretty much screwed?

Thanks a lot.

Hi there. I'm a current grad student at UCLA. There is no portfolio requirement unless you are selected for an interview, in which case it is optional for you to bring one in. I don't think it plays that much of a role in their decision-making process.

They don't care about how much money your undergrad alma mater has for a film budget or any other budget. Where you went to undergrad doesn't play a big role in their decision. We have some ivy leaguers, and some people who graduated from small schools you've never heard of. I studied history, I think only about a quarter of my classmates studied film as an undergrad. I honestly think that coming from an undergrad film background can be more of a hindrance than a help--not to scare you, but they are looking for people with interesting life experiences and/or unique things to say. I would suggest that in your application you discuss something personal about yourself other than film that has you committed to wanting to become a visual storyteller.

Thank you, that's very useful. It'll probably take me six months to think of something that sounds good, though. XD

Hi Ard23,

I'm curious about what UCLA asks for in their optional portfolio. Also, did you take one to your own interview?

Thanks.