|
Go 
|
New 
|
Find 
|
Notify 
|
|
Reply 
|
|
Admin 
|
New PM! 
|
Sophomore

 |
I got a pretty sweet setup, too. 666 megahertz Intel Pentium III Processor 20 Gig HD 320MB PC133 SDRAM... ...Hey, who's laughing? Shutup! My system's awesome. Ah screw it. In all seriousness, though, editing on such a slow comp. with little disk space SUCKS. I would not recommend it. --Alan ------------------ http://www.alandenton.com------------------
|
| |
| Posts: 314 | Location: NY | Registered: January 15, 2003 |    |
|
Sophomore
|
Hmmm. I'd like a Vapochill p4 special system from chillblast.com. It's a 3.06Ghz HT P4 system with 1Gb RAM, 17" TFT Monitor all overclocked to 3.7Ghz! I'd like that hooked up to an Apple XServe with at least 120Gb of RAID storage over gigabit networking. Hooked up to that, i'd like my Powerbook G4. This is basically so I can do large 3dsmax or lightwave projects on the PC while still being able to edit with the Powerbook. I'll not see much change out of 10,000 GBP for that lot ... and I already own the powerbook! Richard Purves One Man Band omb@blueyonder.co.uk http://www.omb.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/
|
| |
| Posts: 253 | Location: Newcastle, UK | Registered: November 04, 2002 |    |
|
Sophomore
|
The question is ... what do you want out of a video card? If you just want to edit video, word process and other non game applications ... and use two monitors without buying two cards then Matrox is what you want. ATI makes wonderful hardware, but my experience of their drivers (both mac and pc) is very poor. I've had no end of bother with them and frankly I personally wouldn't touch them with a 40ft pole. Nvidia cards on the other hand are a dream to install and work with. However, their TV outputs usually leave a little something to be desired. As far as i'm concerned, a GeForce 4 ti4200 will play all current games. Richard Purves One Man Band omb@blueyonder.co.uk http://www.omb.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/
|
| |
| Posts: 253 | Location: Newcastle, UK | Registered: November 04, 2002 |    |
|
Sophomore
|
Not sure about ATI cards, especially the original All In Wonder cards ... but all nvidia GeForce series cards do, especially the GF4's. It's more a question of OS support and graphic card driver support than anything. Richard Purves One Man Band omb@blueyonder.co.uk http://www.omb.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/
|
| |
| Posts: 253 | Location: Newcastle, UK | Registered: November 04, 2002 |    |
|
Freshman
|
hahah guess the film boyz arent always computer geeks..
first of all, dual monitors USED to require two video cards, but with the newest ATI 9700 AIW (All in wonder) card, this is no longer the case.
Newer video cards (such as the AIW 9700 pro) has "dual heads" which is basically an ability to hook up 2 separate monitors to one card. Effectively, you'll be circumventing all and any problems you'd have with having two video cards installed on your system (especially in windows, this can be VERY VERY vicious... and especially if you have 2 vid cards of different brands) anyways, hydravision (what its called) is a very very good compromise.
As for a dream editing system, I dont understand why so many people would get a PC... I've used editing systems under PC and Mac before and I've gotta tell you... for straight-up dream video editing system... Macs beat out ANYTHING that pc's can offer...
a dual g4 system with plenty of ram and FCP 3 is my dream system... who needs a RAID array? it's redundant unless you're looking for backup, the thoroughput of firewire simply wont tax out the modern 7200RPM IDE drive... As for storage, macs use the same drives as PCs... so they're just as cheap! Seriously though, FCP whips out anything on PC right now, the avid programs, vegas video, premiere (gah! premiere is ass to use compared to FCP!) not only does it have faster render times etc etc... with new optimizations under OSX... FCP runs soooo nice and smooth even without fancy extra $$$ render cards (Matrox RapterDV etc)...
Mac's rule for video. Hands down.
|
| |
|
 | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
© Studentfilms.com, Inc. 2008
|
|