|
Go 
|
New 
|
Find 
|
Notify 
|
|
Reply 
|
|
Admin 
|
New PM! 
|
Freshman

|
if you want to do anything serious with it get more ram.....the more the better.....especally if you are doing alot of layers of graphics and filters....I have 768mb on my machine.....I would recomend that you have at least 512mb
|
| |
|
Freshman

|
i dont have a g4 but trust me......its just the rule more ram means better for video........you might also want to check out www.matrox.com and look at the RTMAC if you want to do more real time stuff
|
| |
|
Alumnus

|
I've got a G4 with 1 GB RAM, running FCP in Jaguar. I would definately say run out and buy a 512 MB ram chip first, foremost. If you're gonna do any compositing, buy a second 512 MB RAM chip. Otherwise, spend the rest to buy Jag and a second 7200 rpm IBM dextar harddrive. Only buy a better video card if you want to play 3d games or do 3d modeling. I bought a cheap radeon 7200 card for a second monitor, but it's not any good for 3d stuff. hope this helps joren quote: Originally posted by FANTAZMAGORIC: i dont have a g4 but trust me......its just the rule more ram means better for video........you might also want to check out http://www.matrox.com and look at the RTMAC if you want to do more real time stuff
|
| |
| Posts: 1742 | Location: HELL-A | Registered: March 05, 2003 |    |
|
Alumnus

|
FCP, along with Premiere, doesn't do full quality RT effects, no matter what they claim. That doesn't mean you can't "see what you're doing." I turn RT effects off so I can see what I'm doing, full quality. I left Premiere because I'm faster on FCP--even though I turn all the RT effect rendering off. When I can execute the technical side of editing faster, this leaves more time for creative decision making. I'm not saying Premiere is bad. I'm saying judging whether Premiere is better than FCP or Xpress based on its RT capabilities is missleading.
Regular video cards will not speed up FCP (plus,G4s come with very decent video cards already!). The only card that will help with RT effects is the Matrox card (RTMac), but from what I've read, they are still very buggy (and $1000 or $500 for the old model). Plus, their RT effects are run through the RCA output on the video card, which means you still have to render when outputting via Firewire. That's why I decided I could live without one. If someone else has other experiences, speak up.
joren
|
| |
| Posts: 1742 | Location: HELL-A | Registered: March 05, 2003 |    |
|
Sophomore

|
rjpurves, Final Cut Pro CAN do realtime effects, but only if you have a G4. So if you are running it on a G3 you wouldn't be able to use realtime effects. Also, I wouldn't recomend Xpress DV, it doesn't have quite as many features.
|
| |
|
Sophomore
|
Cyos: FCP did not do ANY realtime effect on either my or my collegue's G4 computers. Hell, i'm now running a new 12" G4 867Mhz Powerbook with 256Mb RAM and my colleague is running an older G4 400Mhz with 512Mb RAM. I still think FCP should do it, but it doesn't. Richard Purves One Man Band omb@blueyonder.co.uk http://www.omb.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/
|
| |
| Posts: 253 | Location: Newcastle, UK | Registered: November 04, 2002 |    |
|
Sophomore
|
To be honest, we've both given up on FCP 3. It was a pain to install, a pain to work with and the no RT was the final straw. They need to make it more user friendly, rather than keep copying Avid. Mind you, it's hardly suprising considering most of Avid's engineers went to Apple to develop FCP. Richard Purves One Man Band omb@blueyonder.co.uk http://www.omb.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/
|
| |
| Posts: 253 | Location: Newcastle, UK | Registered: November 04, 2002 |    |
|
Alumnus

|
It's too bad to hear that. Granted, I'm not the most objective person as I've been using it predominantly for almost 4 years. But when I crossed over from Premiere, I found the learning curve much gentler than everyone warns about. I use different Avid s every once in a while, along with some other outdated NLEs that have to run on pre-G3 powermacs, but I'm so much faster on FCP. These days, all the consumer NLEs are all borrowing so much from each other, they all work about the same (like you said ab o ut FCP v Avid--but if there was no FCP, there'd be no Avid Xpress).
So, too bad FCP failed you. I've been happily working with it and plan to continue whenever I have the option. Hopefully another NLE will be less problematic.
joren
Ohh, and FCP was not created by Apple. Apple bought it and released v1.25 around 1999-2000. (but I think you knew that)
|
| |
| Posts: 1742 | Location: HELL-A | Registered: March 05, 2003 |    |
|
Sophomore
|
Actually ... I didn't! Anyway, i'm waiting until both FCP and Premiere release their next versions. If the rumour mill is true, then Premiere 6.5 will be the last Mac version out ever ... and then i'll HAVE to move to FCP. I hope it isn't. Richard Purves One Man Band omb@blueyonder.co.uk http://www.omb.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/
|
| |
| Posts: 253 | Location: Newcastle, UK | Registered: November 04, 2002 |    |
|
 | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
© Studentfilms.com, Inc. 2008
|
|