|
Go 
|
New 
|
Find 
|
Notify 
|
|
Reply 
|
|
Admin 
|
New PM! 
|
Moderator

 |
But when viewed on something that does show the entire frame, like a computer, or a newer TV, you'll have letterbox edges on all four sides, which will look stupid. I try to plan for the safe-zone even when shooting 16:9 - that's the best plan. | PerryKroll.com | TRC | "If not actually disgruntled, he was far from being gruntled." Wodehouse
|
| |
| Posts: 5197 | Location: Tisch at New York University | Registered: June 03, 2003 |    |
|
Alumnus

|
Ahh, but most consumer camcorder monitors overscan anyway. So by letting the video go past video safe (as it should), chances are the entire shot in which worked hard to frame will be seen in its entirety. Unless you are monitoring on-set with an under-scanning monitor, you're actually giving yourself a larger FOV. Generally this isn't the norm. But who cares, right? At the end of the day, this is just one more choice we as filmmakers make that contributes to the aesthetic of our films. Joren www.jorenclark.com"In the beginner's mind there are many possibilities, but in the expert's mind there are few. " ~Shunryu Suzuki
|
| |
| Posts: 1742 | Location: HELL-A | Registered: March 05, 2003 |    |
|
Moderator

 |
Another layer of complexity... I didn't even think of that. It's true, most LCDs overscan, and a select few have a special "all scan" mode which can be toggled on and off. | PerryKroll.com | TRC | "If not actually disgruntled, he was far from being gruntled." Wodehouse
|
| |
| Posts: 5197 | Location: Tisch at New York University | Registered: June 03, 2003 |    |
|
Senior

|
So the answer is there is no answer? elliott (otiose)...
"Why should North Carolina taxpayers pay for something they find objectionable?" --Sen. Phil Berger, R-Rockingham
|
| |
| Posts: 799 | Location: Arlington, TX | Registered: December 05, 2002 |    |
|
 | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
© Studentfilms.com, Inc. 2008
|
|