Eh, they have their speculations as I have mine. One, if he did in fact use that wireless device, why in the world would he place it somewhere so obvious as on his back where a camera is at? Second, are wireless devices really that big? Third, even if it was that big, why not wear something bigger to make the device less conspicuous? But yeah, I heard this from a co-worker and thought the idea was fishier than the device. Interesting though.
______________________________________ If you want to shoot, shoot. Don't talk! -The Ugly
Posts: 130 | Location: Sacramento, Ca [Most boring city in Cali] | Registered: June 10, 2003
I'm sorry, but why would he tape the thing to his back? Why not stick it in a jacket pocket, or somewhere witha little more room , so it's not os obvious. I don't think the president or any of his helper people are dumb enough to slap it on his back and hope nobody saw it. If they would do anything like this, I'm sure that they make surt nobody could figure out, expecially at anybody home.
You all make excellent points, but whatever, it is fishy. There was undoubtedly something there, and people did notice it, that itself is something to think about. What it is, we'll probably never know. I will stick to my cynical belief until proven incorrect.