Just yesterday, the movie had a modest amount of modest reviews, and now, all of a sudden, there are 40-something lazily written rave reviews? I don't know about you guys, but I definetley smell a rat. Besides for the obvious reasons that someone (I'm not pointing fingers, here...) is pathetically determined to get Jason vs. Soldierman more exposure, all these new reviews have the same spelling habits, if you notice. I think this is totally unfair, and Chris, you should fix this right away.
"I guess Dan Gross was right" -Hill Dawson Kane
Posts: 505 | Location: Connecticut, USA | Registered: September 08, 2003
Im the person who made Jason vs. soldierman and I think its a piece of ****. I dont know why people are giving it good reviews but I assure Im not responsible for it. and frankly I would like to forget I made the stupid thing.
the Boogeyman is real and you found him!
Posts: 99 | Location: vermont | Registered: October 31, 2002
Actually the reviews for that film that were posted are only a FRACTION of what I've received.
I only posted the ones that seemed legit...even though there were a lot of them. There was a time that I was getting 15+ reviews for that film a day. Each with all 5s and obviously fake names.
It is an interesting situation...and someone is obviously trying to boost the ratings. But if someone posts a review that seems legit..I need to post it. What if the review WAS legit and I didn't?
None of the reviews are bashing anyone. Or foul.
They're just boosting the film's ratings.
I'll go through them and remove any more with the obvious fake names.
Perhaps in the future I can add a feature that would minimize this automatically, but one step at a time.
-Chris Studentfilms.com
Posts: 2297 | Location: Los Angeles, CA U.S.A | Registered: October 30, 2002
that would be good cause Ive looked at the reviews and alot of them are being sarcastic and I think the reviews I recived for the film before when I first put it my film on here are ones that were honest and not just trying to be a jerk.
the Boogeyman is real and you found him!
Posts: 99 | Location: vermont | Registered: October 31, 2002
I think that you should take down all reviews with 5 stars for everything. No thought is put into those countless reviews, and no film is really perfect here. Maybe only make an exception if the review left a few sentences.
Posts: 296 | Location: Houston,TX | Registered: December 31, 2002
Yeah, because God knows this film doesn't deserve 5 stars if the filmmaker himself disowns it...although even if Eric didn't disown it, it still definetley wouldn't be worth 5 stars (no offense).
"I guess Dan Gross was right" -Hill Dawson Kane
Posts: 505 | Location: Connecticut, USA | Registered: September 08, 2003
non taken, I agree it does not deserve 5 five stars. I made that film if thats what u can call it when I knew absolutly nothing. now I know a lot more and I know I could make better films then that and I planing on sumbiting two films that Ive made to prove I can make a decent narrative I also plan on taking anthor stab at stop motion again to make up for Jason vs. Soldierman.
the Boogeyman is real and you found him!
Posts: 99 | Location: vermont | Registered: October 31, 2002
Chris do you think you could implement a thing like www.Newgrounds.com 's voteing system? It's Probably too hard but I was wondering if you could somehow do it like they do where the more you vote and review on movies the more your votes count the next time you vote? Just a suggestion.