Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Sophomore
Picture of Ryan Gordon
AIM: Online Status For Iemyourfriend
Posted
How come no film on this site has gotten 5 stars?


___________________
www.jickpictures.com
 
Posts: 204 | Location: So Cal | Registered: December 08, 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Moderator
Picture of titaniumdoughnut
AIM: Online Status For thegoldencheddar
Posted Hide Post
bigmovie would be delighted to tell you why Big Grin


the top rated has 53 reviews, 4.5 stars. if there were 10 2 star reviews and 43 5 star reviews the film would have 4.4339622641509 stars.

thats an extreme (and long numbered) answer, but all it takes is a few people who give it less than perfect to get it down from five, and there will always be those people, even if it is perfect. which, by the way, i highly doubt anything on this site is Smile look at rotten tomatos reviews, even really popular films never get quite perfect reviews when you add them all together.


| PerryKroll.com | TRC | "If not actually disgruntled, he was far from being gruntled." Wodehouse
 
Posts: 5197 | Location: Tisch at New York University | Registered: June 03, 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Alumnus
Posted Hide Post
I think it's better to have no 5 stars, I mean look at a sport like figure skating, the first competitor never gets higher than a 5.5 out of 6, NEVER. Because there needs to be room for ambition, u can't beat a film thats a perfect 5, but u cna beat a 4.9, and that gives us filmmakers motivation, also, if a film has 49 5 star reviews, someone will watch it expecting Citizen Kane, and when they don't get it theyll feel it over rated and give it 4 stars. I've never given a perfect 5 myself, cause therees always something in the acting or screenplay that is a little off
 
Posts: 2173 | Location: n/a | Registered: May 06, 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Junior
MSN does not support status - click here for the profile.
Posted Hide Post
HDK, exactly what i was about to say


Matthew Parnell
Electric
 
Posts: 461 | Location: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia | Registered: April 26, 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Alumnus
Picture of Kyle Johnson
AIM: Online Status For KyleJohnson420
Posted Hide Post
if I enjoy a film a lot, I'll usually just give it all 5s regardless.
 
Posts: 3863 | Location: Sacramento, CA | Registered: July 21, 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Graduate
Posted Hide Post
quote:
look at http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/lord_of_the_rings_the_return_of_the_king/, even really popular films never get quite perfect reviews when you add them all together.


A lot of movies have ****ty things in them.

I think Dr. Strangelove got 100 percent on that site. That's because it's perfect.
 
Posts: 842 | Location: Oakland | Registered: January 13, 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Moderator
Picture of titaniumdoughnut
AIM: Online Status For thegoldencheddar
Posted Hide Post
yeah, a lot of old stuff got 100%. reviewers used to be much kinder.


| PerryKroll.com | TRC | "If not actually disgruntled, he was far from being gruntled." Wodehouse
 
Posts: 5197 | Location: Tisch at New York University | Registered: June 03, 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Graduate
Picture of Durden
Posted Hide Post
Plus, Dr. Strangelove is an amazing movie. It should get 100%. So should Casablanca and Citizen Kane. I mean, Citizen Kane IS considered the best movie of all time (or at least the most important for filmmakers). And Casablanca is just an awesome movie. I like it better than Citizen Kane. The only thing is: Citizen Kane was groundbreaking. Moreso than Casablanca.


-------
Check out my new band:
www.purevolume.com/thisislandearthstl
 
Posts: 854 | Location: O'Fallon, MO, U.S.A. | Registered: January 21, 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Freshman
Posted Hide Post
I think because multiple people vote, your never gonna have all 5 stars. That means everybody that votes all have to love it, in all 6 categories.

everybody has different tastes. So it doesn't really mean ther isn't a perfect film.

If a critic gives something 5 stars or 1 star, it's one person. but if you look in the Entertainment weekly at the grades for the theatrical films all added up, almost all average a B or C. No f's, no a's, even if the critics indivisually gave it that.


Alter Ego Cinema
www.alteregocinema.com
Home of "Big BOOBS, Blonde BABES, Bad BLOOD" the movie
 
Posts: 49 | Location: Santa Barbara County, CA | Registered: October 21, 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Freshman
AIM: Online Status For nxtbestguitarist
Posted Hide Post
quote:
I think Dr. Strangelove got 100 percent on that site. That's because it's perfect.
Hell yea. Cool


"...Some fat girl in Ohio will make a beautiful film with her dad's 8mm camera and I'll be history..."
-Francis Ford Coppola on filmmaking
 
Posts: 30 | Location: South Carolina, USA | Registered: October 23, 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Owner and Founder of Studentfilms.com
Picture of Studentfilms.com
Posted Hide Post
In order to have a film be rated as a 5 it needs to have NEVER received a review less than a 5. The second someone reviews it with a 4 or less, the average is no longer a 5.

-Chris
Studentfilms.com


-Chris Wright
Founder and CEO of Studentfilms.com, Inc.
http://www.studentfilms.com
 
Posts: 2287 | Location: Los Angeles, CA U.S.A | Registered: October 30, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  
 


© Studentfilms.com, Inc. 2008