Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Freshman
Posted
I have the opportunity to purchase the trv900 for $999 CDN (about $820 US). Is this a good deal? I was also looking at the Pan pv-gs65 for about $680 CDN. I know the trv900 is pretty old, but still good, so which is better? What can the trv900 be compared to of similar quality today?

Thanks
 
Posts: 29 | Location: Ontario | Registered: July 10, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Sophomore
Posted Hide Post
Are you getting it new? Its a great camera but unless it comes with a lot of accessories I wouldn't go for it. Ive seen used ones too for like 400 that come with everything. I wouldn't honestly. I love that camera but I wouldn't unless you absolutely need it.
 
Posts: 218 | Location: Art Center College of Design | Registered: November 26, 2002Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Administrator
Picture of Josh
Posted Hide Post
The TRV900 is an excellent camera. Not sure if it's worth it for that price, but I recommend it anyway.
 
Posts: 2277 | Location: Boston | Registered: September 18, 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Sophomore
Picture of Diego
Posted Hide Post
Get the Panasonic. It's newer, thus meaning it has newer technology and probably better picture quality. Get the Sony if you shoot with a lot of low light.


__________________________

Meatloaf F*CK!!!
-Wedding Crashers
 
Posts: 295 | Location: Montreal, Quebec | Registered: April 27, 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Graduate
Picture of Bruce the moose
Posted Hide Post
Get the sony and send me that cool lens hood it comes with Wink All joking aside, I'd get the sony they are always more reliable and usually have better picture quality (expecially when compared to a gs65).


Shakespeare says "Prose before hoes."
 
Posts: 851 | Location: Knoxville TN | Registered: October 10, 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  
 


© Studentfilms.com, Inc. 2008