Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Freshman
Picture of kylevant
Posted
Ok I'm not to sure about this... Someone told me I should start shooting in widescreen for my next short. I'm not too sure about it 'cause on normal 4:3 screens its doesn't look too great. What are the advantages, anyone? Roll Eyes
 
Posts: 164 | Location: South Africa | Registered: November 29, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Moderator
Picture of braininabox
Posted Hide Post
Most people would tell you that shooting in widescreen gives your film a more professional and clean-cut feel. (but thats up for debate)


Widescreen should look perfectly normal on 4:3 televisions unless you do it wrong. The way you choose to achieve the widescreen shooting ratio depends on your camera and editing software.


"Important dialog is only in Hollywood films" - Kyle Phillip Johnson
 
Posts: 1275 | Location: Indiana | Registered: May 23, 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Moderator
Picture of titaniumdoughnut
AIM: Online Status For thegoldencheddar
Posted Hide Post
Do not shoot widescreen on your camera. It squeezes the footage, lowering the resolution. If you've got an HD camera, that's another story.

What you want to do with a DV camera is cover the view-screen with tape to mark a 16:9 area, and then apply a matte in post-production to add the black bars. Now it'll play fine on a regular TV, and look all cool and filmic. The widescreen composition is definitely more cinematic.


| PerryKroll.com | TRC | "If not actually disgruntled, he was far from being gruntled." Wodehouse
 
Posts: 5197 | Location: Tisch at New York University | Registered: June 03, 2003Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Sophomore
Picture of politicsofecstacy
Posted Hide Post
I've seen other people do fine with it, but I've personally always had great contempt for 4:3 format. You just seem to have so many more options for making a good composition in widescreen.
 
Posts: 204 | Location: Dothan | Registered: April 02, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Senior
Picture of Cinematical
AIM: Online Status For jonnymaximus
Posted Hide Post
Widescreen is much more suited for the cinema look than 4:3. If you can start practicing with 16:9, than do it.
 
Posts: 674 | Location: So Cal | Registered: March 20, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Freshman
Posted Hide Post
A clarification: Depending on your camera, you are probably NOT losing resolution by switching to 16:9 mode. For instance, a Sony PD150 will stretch your image, yes, but when you capture your footage it must be captured as ANAMORPHIC. Also you must set up an anamorphic timeline. If you have done this all correctly (search a technical DV forum or an editing manual for details) in Final Cut, for instance, there will NOT be black bars. The preview window itself will be 16:9. Then when exporting it, depending on your settings, you may shoose to output an anamorphic file (will look stetched on normal tvs and correct on widescreen setups), letterboxed, or cropped.

The stretchng is actually what keeps ALL the pixels in use. It is the same practise as using an anamorphic lens to fill a more-square film frame. The process streches the image out and then it must be played back on a projector with an anamorphic lens to squeeze it back. On most consumer/prosumer camcorders, this is done digitally. If you choose to crop your video in post, you WILL loose resolution, obviously, because about 1/3 of your pixels are being used to display black bars instead of your image. a 16:9 TV will either still show the black bars (squeezing your image further), or digitally zoom in to get rid of the bars and thus enlarge the size of your pixels...ugly.

Go anamorphic.
 
Posts: 7 | Location: Ball State University | Registered: June 13, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Freshman
Picture of Lily
Posted Hide Post
I'm shooting with a Panasonic DVX 100A next week. And I've been very much debating this question. This camera is nice because it shoots true 16:9 aspect ratio... but I'm also shooting a scene in the water with a pansonic handicam-a good one-but it doesn't shoot in true widescreen mode. So I would have to shoot in 4:3 and then change it into widescreen in post (which you can do, but I heard it loses some resolution).

Problem is, I really do love the widescreen 'look'. So I think I'm gonna do it... hmmm.


everything'll be OK in the end, if it's not OK, it's not the end.
 
Posts: 103 | Location: Los Angeles | Registered: April 12, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Moderator
Posted Hide Post
I own a DVX100b and the camera does not shoot native widescreen. To get the best widescreen results however, use Squeeze mode and Thin. That's what Iraq in Fragments was shot with - check out the trailer and the quality is pretty good. Yes, even the DVX loses resolution as any camera that doesn't shoot native 16:9 and it will probably be a lot more significant on the Handycam.

Oh wait, you're just going to edit it in post for the handycam footage? In that case, just try to frame it as if it were 16:9, perhaps using tape or another method and just add in the black lines in post.

-Kegan
 
Posts: 289 | Location: Toronto, ON | Registered: May 12, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Freshman
Picture of Lily
Posted Hide Post
Kegan-
Yes, I realize I should use the Squeeze feature and shoot anamorphic.

And yes, with the handicam I would shoot 4:3 and get it to match up in post... just have to make sure I allow for the correct framing.


everything'll be OK in the end, if it's not OK, it's not the end.
 
Posts: 103 | Location: Los Angeles | Registered: April 12, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Moderator
Posted Hide Post
Good, framing on a 4:3 screen will be hard I imagine. Does the handycam have a widescreen LCD or is it just a normal 4:3 screen?

Shooting "squeeze" and "anamorphic" are a little different, as anamorphic requires the adapter that screws onto the lens.

I'm not sure of your in-water shot, but unless its a fast, shaky, blurry or unclear scene...you'll notice a significant difference in DVX footage and the handycam. Just offering some advice.

-Kegan
 
Posts: 289 | Location: Toronto, ON | Registered: May 12, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Freshman
Picture of Lily
Posted Hide Post
Kegan,
I'm aware that there's going to be a difference between the handicam and the dvx... but since that shot is in the water, I'm going with it.

I have an underwater housing for the handicam, so not only will I not be able to use the LCD, but even looking through the camera viewfinder itself will be a *****.

Again, it's in the water, so the moving, splashing, watery thing will help me out... are you saying that stretching it out from 4:3 into 16:9 in post is what will make me lose resolution-or that the camera itself is just inferior? or both?

I guess I didn't realize the difference about anamorphic and squeeze... so no, i will not be shooting anamorphic, ie, i don't have the adaptor. but i'll shoot squeeze mode i think for sure... i just love the widescreen 'look'.

If everything will be easier to deal with, and easier to edit, it is appealing to consider shooting all in 4:3... but i'm pretty attached to the widescreen thing. hmmm...


everything'll be OK in the end, if it's not OK, it's not the end.
 
Posts: 103 | Location: Los Angeles | Registered: April 12, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Moderator
Posted Hide Post
Well, the camera is inferior yes - but if things will be moving fast and splashy then you're fine. It's a different type of shot regardless, so I'm sure it won't look that much worse. Both the camera itself and stretching it out in post will make it lose resolution.

Now, to get max resolution shooting all 4:3 would make sense, but to be honest - shooting 16:9 on the DVX with squeeze mode and the detail level on thin, you should be fine. As for the handicam, shoot 4:3 and add the lines in post. Stretching it out to 16:9 will lose even more resolution. Adding black lines to 4:3 footage will give the widescreen look and keep resolution as its already inferior to the DVX.

Since you can't see the LCD or viewfinder, it may be hard to do so unless there isn't a specific subject and its just establishing that you are indeed underwater.

-Kegan
 
Posts: 289 | Location: Toronto, ON | Registered: May 12, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Freshman
Picture of Alex"blakc007"
AIM: Online Status For bigalfoshizzle
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by titaniumdoughnut:
Do not shoot widescreen on your camera. It squeezes the footage, lowering the resolution. If you've got an HD camera, that's another story...


HD should shoot native 16:9 right ? like the
canon xl-h1 and the panasonic hvx ? or what do you mean coz I'm looking into an hd camera for shooting 16:9 ?


@@@☺☺☺♠♠☺♠۩♠♠♠♠♠****
 
Posts: 142 | Location: 'THE' YOU-KNighteds-Tates-Aav-Imerica | Registered: December 08, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Freshman
Picture of kylevant
Posted Hide Post
Thanks all. I decided to take some test shots in widescreen. It looks fantastic. Looks like I’ll be shooting my next short in 16x9. Big Grin
 
Posts: 164 | Location: South Africa | Registered: November 29, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Freshman
Posted Hide Post
quote:
Originally posted by Alex"blakc007":
[QUOTE]HD should shoot native 16:9 right ? like the canon xl-h1 and the panasonic hvx ? or what do you mean coz I'm looking into an hd camera for shooting 16:9 ?


Yes. The HD and HDV standards are both 16:9.
 
Posts: 7 | Location: Ball State University | Registered: June 13, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  
 


© Studentfilms.com, Inc. 2008