|
Go 
|
New 
|
Find 
|
Notify 
|
|
Reply 
|
|
Admin 
|
New PM! 
|
Alumnus
|
One. I turn the camera on and don't stop. Usually for one 60 minute tape, but sometimes two.
|
| |
|
Moderator

 |
It varies a lot. On a short I DPed in the spring (shooting HDV) with a decent-sized crew we managed about 3 scenes in an 8-hour day, averaging about 25 shots per scene. Recently, shooting 16mm on 100' reels with a crew of four, we've been averaging around 20 shots in 4-5 hours. I managed 27 yesterday, with slow-motion and smoke. Fun fun. | PerryKroll.com | TRC | "If not actually disgruntled, he was far from being gruntled." Wodehouse
|
| |
| Posts: 5197 | Location: Tisch at New York University | Registered: June 03, 2003 |    |
|
Alumnus
|
quote: Isn't it annoying to have to import a bunch of useless extra footage? When I work on DV (actually, an upcoming project will be on video), I still start and stop the camera for each take unless they are very close together.
Have you ever missed a small little thing, or a performance cause your camera wasn't running? Haven't you ever run on a rehersal on the actors, and called cut and print after one rehersal because they nail it simply because they're unfamiliar with a scene like they would be in normal life? You get great stuff that you'd never consider in the first place, try telling an actor to swear for a scene and be upset, it usually comes off as fake, but if he screws up his lines and gets pissed and just starts swearing it'll be genuine, and if you steal these types of shots they add a great element to any project. Also, ppl probably don't go through the trouble (and neither do I) of shooting a "making of." I've always just taken all the dialogue between me and my actors while the tape rolls, the discussions and changing of ideas, they usually misinderstand what I want and do something better.
|
| |
|
Alumnus
|
quote: Keeping the camera always rolling is about the worst idea ever. Editing will be a nightmare.
When you edit your own stuff (which everybody should do) it doesnt make that much of a difference.
|
| |
|
Alumnus
|
quote: When you edit your own stuff (which everybody should do) it doesnt make that much of a difference.
I think it makes a difference qualitatively. Even if you cut out the parts between takes or setups, if you leave the camera rolling you tend to frame differently than using discrete setups. Try treating your video camera like a film camera (no, I don't mean taking it to bed with you). Try to use as little tape as possible and frame each shot carefully. I guarantee you will see some effect on your work, although whether you like it or not is personal preference. Just today I was experimenting with my GL2 for an upcoming short, leaving it recording and walking around the house finding objects to point at. The mode of visualization is very different when you leave it running. And yes, it does create a hassle to import and look through all that footage.
|
| |
| Posts: 1871 | Location: Gainesville, FL | Registered: April 05, 2004 |    |
|
Alumnus
|
quote: Try treating your video camera like a film camera (no, I don't mean taking it to bed with you). Try to use as little tape as possible and frame each shot carefully. I guarantee you will see some effect on your work, although whether you like it or not is personal preference.
Of course it will, but will it make those performances any better (not "look" better, but "be" better)?
|
| |
|
Alumnus
|
quote: Of course it will, but will it make those performances any better (not "look" better, but "be" better)?
Why not? It forces the actors to get try more to get it right the first time, and thus think about their characters on a deeper level.
|
| |
| Posts: 1150 | Location: Marienbad | Registered: June 24, 2005 |    |
|
Alumnus
|
quote: Of course it will, but will it make those performances any better (not "look" better, but "be" better)?
It doesn't really matter how good it "was" in real life. Just how well it comes across on the recording - unless you're doing theatre. It certainly won't hurt the performances.
|
| |
| Posts: 1871 | Location: Gainesville, FL | Registered: April 05, 2004 |    |
|
Alumnus
|
quote: Why not? It forces the actors to get try more to get it right the first time, and thus think about their characters on a deeper level.
But nobody gets on Stanley Kubrick for doing 80 takes on Jack Nicholson in "The Shining" he just had the economics to shoot them all on film. Taking advantage of the cheap economics of video shouldn't take away from the "art."
|
| |
|
Freshman
|
When shooting on digital, I'll go over with the actors the blocking of the shot and any other small details, and then have them do the first take with the camera recording. I'll make adjustments from there, but I always want to record that first take. But when shooting on film, at least for a class project/exercise, that really isn't an option. Half of the effort is making the film, the other half is saving the film. On my last digital production, http://www.studentfilms.com/film/get.do?id=1258which came out to 14 mins, I filmed almost everything during two 7 hour days. So I guess about an hour a minute, but I was really rushed.
|
| |
| Posts: 25 | Location: NYU Tisch | Registered: March 09, 2006 |    |
|
 | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
© Studentfilms.com, Inc. 2008
|
|