|
Go 
|
New 
|
Find 
|
Notify 
|
|
Reply 
|
|
Admin 
|
New PM! 
|
Moderator

 |
This should have gone in your other wide angle lens thread.... Anyway, I believe it widens the DOF but I'm not sure. That's just the impression I get. | PerryKroll.com | TRC | "If not actually disgruntled, he was far from being gruntled." Wodehouse
|
| |
| Posts: 5197 | Location: Tisch at New York University | Registered: June 03, 2003 |    |
|
Moderator

 |
I thought DOF was how wide the area in focus was. For example, a macro closeup has a very shallow DOF and the area in focus is often only about an inch of distance (measured away from the lens) where as a wide shot has a DOF of dozens of feet. | PerryKroll.com | TRC | "If not actually disgruntled, he was far from being gruntled." Wodehouse
|
| |
| Posts: 5197 | Location: Tisch at New York University | Registered: June 03, 2003 |    |
|
Graduate
|
now I am really curious about it. Of course wider lenses have bigger depth of field...but probably nota could help out here. say I use a 85mm lens (35mm) and frame a standart close up. Then I use a 25 lens and frame the exact same close up (I move the lens real close to the subject. I believe the depth of field should be the same. Therefore, it is questionable if really the focal lenght makes the difference in depth of field. Never tried it, I just remember my cinematography teacher at NYU said so 
|
| |
| Posts: 820 | Location: NYC | Registered: November 29, 2002 |    |
|
Moderator

 |
Yeah.... I never thought of that. I'm going to test this out with my still camera I think... I'll let you know what happens! | PerryKroll.com | TRC | "If not actually disgruntled, he was far from being gruntled." Wodehouse
|
| |
| Posts: 5197 | Location: Tisch at New York University | Registered: June 03, 2003 |    |
|
Alumnus

|
I think you'll find it does .. . . but not as much as the size of the imaging plane, distance to subject, or the aperture. I was going to do some still tests too! I have a few lens' that are zooms and are f2.8 across the zoom range so the DoF should stay constant (and small!). Joren www.jorenclark.com"In the beginner's mind there are many possibilities, but in the expert's mind there are few. " ~Shunryu Suzuki
|
| |
| Posts: 1742 | Location: HELL-A | Registered: March 05, 2003 |    |
|
Moderator

 |
Ok, here's a quick experiment I did with my manual still camera. While I don't know the lens mm sizes so I can't be exact, it does seem to indicate that the DOF is markedly wider even on low F numbers with the wider lenses. (ps - sorry about the grain, 400 ISO, ugh) | PerryKroll.com | TRC | "If not actually disgruntled, he was far from being gruntled." Wodehouse
|
| |
| Posts: 5197 | Location: Tisch at New York University | Registered: June 03, 2003 |    |
|
Alumnus
|
quote: Frame a head with a telephoto lens and get exactly the same frame with a wide angel lens and the depth of field should be the same. I man be wrong about this but I heard it from several sources before
No... The main factors influencing DOF are focal length (related to imaged area) and aperture. This is the reason why a "film-like" DOF is nearly impossible to achieve with most DV cameras - the CCDs are so small that the focal range is very large, flattening the image.
|
| |
| Posts: 1871 | Location: Gainesville, FL | Registered: April 05, 2004 |    |
|
Graduate
|
hehe I got something wrong, obviously shame on me  )
|
| |
| Posts: 820 | Location: NYC | Registered: November 29, 2002 |    |
|
Moderator

 |
It was a fully manual digital camera. The Canon Powershot A80. A decent little consumer model, created before they ruined the Powershot series. By the way, I just order a Rebel XT!! I'm so excited! | PerryKroll.com | TRC | "If not actually disgruntled, he was far from being gruntled." Wodehouse
|
| |
| Posts: 5197 | Location: Tisch at New York University | Registered: June 03, 2003 |    |
|
Alumnus

|
quote: Originally posted by titaniumdoughnut: By the way, I just order a Rebel XT!! I'm so excited!
Nice, it's a great cam. I'm looking for an excuse to upgrade to that from my 300D, but I sort of have an addiction to lens' that keeps my photography budget spoken for pretty quickly. Joren www.jorenclark.com"In the beginner's mind there are many possibilities, but in the expert's mind there are few. " ~Shunryu Suzuki
|
| |
| Posts: 1742 | Location: HELL-A | Registered: March 05, 2003 |    |
|
Moderator

 |
I will fall prey to the same addiction now that I'm getting a camera worth buying lenses for. It's coming with a telephoto lens, and some kind of cheap looking wide angle adaptor, but I'm sure I'll be going nuts to get more glass pretty soon. | PerryKroll.com | TRC | "If not actually disgruntled, he was far from being gruntled." Wodehouse
|
| |
| Posts: 5197 | Location: Tisch at New York University | Registered: June 03, 2003 |    |
|
Moderator

 |
DOF is also made narrower by wider apertures and lower F stops. | PerryKroll.com | TRC | "If not actually disgruntled, he was far from being gruntled." Wodehouse
|
| |
| Posts: 5197 | Location: Tisch at New York University | Registered: June 03, 2003 |    |
|
 | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
© Studentfilms.com, Inc. 2008
|
|