Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Freshman
Picture of kylevant
Posted
I’m going to be getting a new PC and want to know how many people prefer AMD and how many prefer Intel? I guess this one excludes all the Apple guys since all the new Macs are Intel.

Question:
AMD or INTEL?

Choices:
AMD
INTEL

 
 
Posts: 120 | Location: South Africa | Registered: November 29, 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Moderator
Picture of braininabox
Posted Hide Post
Well AMD and Intel are constantly one-upping eachother. I have been fairly impressed with the performance of my my AMD CPU (Athlon X2 4400+), so I will stand by AMD. (its hilarious that only 2 years ago when this line of dual core CPUs was introduced this processor was retailing for $580...now I think you can pick up a new one with an offical AMD warranty for probably $75 off of eBay?)

However, I know as soon as Cinematical sees this thread, he is really going to push for Intel. Big Grin


"Important dialog is only in Hollywood films" - Kyle Phillip Johnson
 
Posts: 1082 | Location: Indiana | Registered: May 23, 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Moderator
Posted Hide Post
Well, as of now Intel is really pushing their new Penryn processors, with the first of the bunch already released (e8400 - 3ghz dual core). It is an incredibly fast processor, despite only being dual core.

Something to mention about deciding about quad, dual etc. Not a lot of software can support quad core and it all depends on what you plan on doing with it. Intel at the moment is ahead of the game and with these Penryn processors, they're really upping the ante.

I have built machines with both AMD and Intel processors and have had good results with both. It just seems that Intel is pulling ahead of the game and really putting out some solid processors.

By the way, I'm an Apple guy now but I still keep up my research on the debate between AMD and Intel.

Good luck,

Kegan
 
Posts: 277 | Location: Toronto, ON | Registered: May 12, 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Junior
Picture of Cinematical
AIM: Online Status For jonnymaximus
Posted Hide Post
Currently AMD cannot even begin to match Intel on processor efficiency and price. For the same price, you get a better processor with Intel - no exception. AMD has simply delayed their response to Intel's Core-2-Duo line too long and has fallen behind.
 
Posts: 571 | Location: So Cal | Registered: March 20, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Junior
Picture of Cinematical
AIM: Online Status For jonnymaximus
Posted Hide Post
Haha, wow, I didn't even finish reading Braininabox's post until I posted my own.

Stop knowing what I'm going to do!!
 
Posts: 571 | Location: So Cal | Registered: March 20, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Junior
Picture of Cinematical
AIM: Online Status For jonnymaximus
Posted Hide Post
Wait, didn't we argue about this a while back?

Search!
 
Posts: 571 | Location: So Cal | Registered: March 20, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Moderator
Picture of braininabox
Posted Hide Post
Yep...we had a decently sized argument over this a while back. However that was back when AMD and Intel were a little more neck-and-neck in the industry, so my pro-AMD argument was fairly valid.

Now, however, I will admit that Intel has really pulled ahead (for now).


"Important dialog is only in Hollywood films" - Kyle Phillip Johnson
 
Posts: 1082 | Location: Indiana | Registered: May 23, 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Junior
Picture of Cinematical
AIM: Online Status For jonnymaximus
Posted Hide Post
I just don't see how AMD can get back in the game after delaying Phenom over and over - that CPU was only meant to mach Core-2-Duo, and it's been delayed so many times.
 
Posts: 571 | Location: So Cal | Registered: March 20, 2007Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  
 


© Studentfilms.com, Inc. 2008