|
Go 
|
New 
|
Find 
|
Notify 
|
|
Reply 
|
|
Admin 
|
New PM! 
|
Freshman
|
24PA is the way to go. It uses a cleaner method of reproducing the frames, which is good necessary if you plan on putting it on a DVD or film. Because yes, technically you're editing on a 29.97 timebase, but whenever you telecine ot film or burn it to a DVD, it's going to go back to its 24P timebase, and so it's cleaner to use 24PA than 24P. 24PA = completely remove 2 frames, the rest are fully intact. 24P = remove 1 frame, merge 2 = lower quality when sent back to 24P.
|
| |
| Posts: 71 | Location: Soquel, CA, USA | Registered: November 18, 2002 |    |
|
Freshman
|
The only question here is whether or not your NLE can resolve interlaced fields pulled down in a 2:3:2:3 cadence back to their original frames.
Both settings perform a pull-down, regular does 2:3:2:3 and advanced does 2:3:3:2. The advanced cadence allows you to drop two fields, one each from the two middle frames, and not have to deal with pulling apart the 5th and 6th fields to get your original frames. Either way, you should be able to get back to your original 24 fps.
You can output from there accordingly. As long as you get back to your original 24 fps, the output options, whether to film or DVD, are not affected by what cadence you captured at, at least to my knowledge.
Please note that with advanced you are dropping FIELDS, not frames. No frames are ever dropped in either mode, you don't lose frames. When talking about pull-down, frames and fields mean specific things and you can't use one in place of the other. Doing so results purely in misinformation and confussion.
My advice is to find out the deal with your software, and if you can resolve 2:3:2:3 then go with regular 24p. That way, you're not dealing with the visual stutter that accompanies the advanced mode.
|
| |
| Posts: 75 | Location: Los Angeles, CA | Registered: August 09, 2003 |    |
|
 | Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
© Studentfilms.com, Inc. 2008
|
|